SWBGX vs. SWHGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX).
SWBGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. SWHGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995.
Performance
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | -0.51% | 14.73% | 9.10% | 14.99% | -14.35% | 12.85% | 10.50% | 18.56% | -5.43% | 12.70% |
SWHGX Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ | -0.60% | 17.49% | 11.76% | 18.22% | -15.06% | 18.09% | 11.02% | 22.23% | -7.19% | 16.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than SWHGX's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has underperformed SWHGX with an annualized return of 7.54%, while SWHGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.
SWBGX
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 13.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
SWHGX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWHGX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWBGX vs. SWHGX — Risk / Return Rank
SWBGX
SWHGX
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWBGX | SWHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 1.86 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.76 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 8.29 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWBGX | SWHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.50 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBGX and SWHGX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Dividend Comparison
SWBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, less than SWHGX's 9.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 7.73% | 7.69% | 10.74% | 4.23% | 4.13% | 5.02% | 6.41% | 4.42% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 3.18% | 14.29% |
SWHGX Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ | 9.65% | 9.59% | 11.68% | 4.00% | 4.53% | 5.04% | 8.15% | 5.76% | 5.76% | 4.87% | 3.73% | 14.80% |
Drawdowns
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, smaller than the maximum SWHGX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and SWHGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBGX | SWHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -49.19% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -9.78% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.97% | -25.63% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.97% | -29.77% | +5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -5.31% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -7.21% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.08% | -0.44% |
Volatility
SWBGX vs. SWHGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) is 3.74%, while Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that SWBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWHGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWBGX | SWHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.74% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | 7.61% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.24% | 13.38% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.00% | 13.53% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 14.23% | -3.28% |