SWBGX vs. FNDB
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB).
SWBGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. FNDB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI US. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013.
Performance
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | -2.12% | 14.73% | 9.10% | 14.99% | -14.35% | 12.85% | 10.50% | 18.56% | -5.43% | 12.70% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 2.77% | 16.23% | 16.25% | 18.42% | -7.53% | 31.55% | 9.40% | 28.88% | -8.20% | 16.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 2.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has underperformed FNDB with an annualized return of 7.36%, while FNDB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.03% annualized return.
SWBGX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
FNDB
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWBGX vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
SWBGX
FNDB
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWBGX | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.79 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.72 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 8.07 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWBGX | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.75 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.75 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.74 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBGX and FNDB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
SWBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than FNDB's 1.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 7.86% | 7.69% | 10.74% | 4.23% | 4.13% | 5.02% | 6.41% | 4.42% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 3.18% | 14.29% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.61% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, which is greater than FNDB's maximum drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and FNDB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBGX | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -38.17% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -12.24% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.97% | -19.29% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.97% | -38.17% | +14.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -4.39% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.70% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.62% | -1.00% |
Volatility
SWBGX vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) is 3.22%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that SWBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWBGX | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 4.19% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 8.43% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 16.35% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 15.45% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 17.49% | -6.56% |