PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWBGX vs. FNDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has underperformed FNDB with an annualized return of 7.96%, while FNDB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.


SWBGX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.52%
6M
5.71%
YTD
7.58%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
7.96%

FNDB

1D
0.19%
1M
0.92%
6M
12.81%
YTD
16.67%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
13.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWBGX
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™
7.58%14.73%9.10%14.99%-14.35%12.85%10.50%18.56%-5.43%12.70%
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
16.67%16.23%16.25%18.42%-7.53%31.55%9.40%28.88%-8.20%16.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SWBGX and FNDB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.90

The correlation between SWBGX and FNDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWBGX vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWBGX
SWBGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SWBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SWBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWBGXFNDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

4.52

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

17.24

-6.45

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FNDB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWBGX and FNDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, which is greater than FNDB's maximum drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and FNDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWBGXFNDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.37%

-38.17%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-6.29%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.69%

-16.83%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.97%

-19.29%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.97%

-38.17%

+14.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-3.64%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.65%

-0.27%

Volatility

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWBGXFNDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.64%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

7.77%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

10.82%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.07%

15.30%

-4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.94%

17.42%

-6.48%

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWBGX vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison

SWBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than FNDB's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.44%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%
SWBGX
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™
7.15%7.69%10.74%4.23%4.13%5.02%6.41%4.42%7.11%5.30%3.18%14.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWBGX and FNDB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDB has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to SWBGX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBGX dropped -40.37% vs FNDB's -38.17%.

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWBGX and FNDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer