SWASX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
SWASX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -7.66% | 14.38% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | -0.08% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than FRINX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 3.10%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.00% annualized return.
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
FRINX
SWASX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.86 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 4.35 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.86 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.56 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.53 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.75 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and FRINX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FRINX's 4.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -34.50% | -34.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -4.28% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -18.30% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | -34.50% | -9.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -3.12% | -7.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -3.41% | -12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.01% | +1.57% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.55%. This indicates that SWASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 1.55% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 2.84% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 4.92% | +8.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 6.51% | +8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 9.50% | +7.54% |