SWASX vs. FRINX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWASX (Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™) and FRINX (Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, SWASX returned 3.62%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for FRINX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWASX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for FRINX.

Performance

SWASX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 3.62%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.07% annualized return.

SWASX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -1.52%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 12.40%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 3.62%

FRINX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 7.95%
• 3Y*: 8.17%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 5.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWASX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™	6.48%	11.33%	1.42%	8.49%	-25.10%	25.32%	-12.10%	27.81%	-7.66%	14.38%
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A	3.52%	6.87%	7.61%	9.01%	-14.79%	18.64%	-1.36%	17.52%	-1.93%	6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SWASX and FRINX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010	0.84

The correlation between SWASX and FRINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWASX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWASX

SWASX Risk / Return Rank: 14
SWASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SWASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SWASX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SWASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SWASX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FRINX

FRINX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FRINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FRINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FRINX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FRINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FRINX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWASX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWASX	FRINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.98	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.85	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.37	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	2.32	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	10.25	-5.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWASX vs. FRINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the FRINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWASX and FRINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWASX	FRINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.98	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.52	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.54	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.77	-0.66

Drawdowns

SWASX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and FRINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWASX	FRINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.47%	-34.50%	-34.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-3.45%	-7.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-7.27%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-18.30%	-14.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.19%	-34.50%	-9.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.40%	-0.48%	-3.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.51%	-3.38%	-12.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	0.78%	+2.02%

Volatility

SWASX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.19%. This indicates that SWASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWASX	FRINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	1.19%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	3.12%	+5.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.15%	4.03%	+7.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	6.48%	+8.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	9.50%	+7.58%

SWASX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWASX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison

SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than FRINX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A	4.28%	4.40%	4.41%	4.78%	5.80%	1.31%	4.53%	5.45%	4.89%	4.21%	4.77%	3.53%
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™	3.26%	3.11%	3.32%	3.29%	3.00%	3.71%	2.94%	7.38%	4.24%	3.32%	4.67%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWASX and FRINX in my portfolio?

SWASX and FRINX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWASX or FRINX?

SWASX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to FRINX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWASX dropped -69.47% vs FRINX's -34.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.