SWASX vs. FIKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. FIKMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -2.35% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
Returns By Period
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
FIKMX
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.94 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.25 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 4.71 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.94 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.51 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and FIKMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FIKMX's 4.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.80% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and FIKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -34.49% | -34.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -4.35% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -18.04% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -3.12% | -7.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -5.26% | -10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.02% | +1.56% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.57%. This indicates that SWASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 1.57% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 2.88% | +4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 4.95% | +8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 6.52% | +8.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 10.69% | +6.35% |