PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVXY vs. CLSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVXY vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVXY achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 25.76% return.


SVXY

1D
-0.20%
1M
8.44%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
7.55%
1Y
33.37%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
15.76%
10Y*
-1.59%

CLSE

1D
0.35%
1M
9.28%
YTD
25.76%
6M
28.57%
1Y
50.91%
3Y*
32.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVXY vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SVXY
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-0.92%10.63%-3.17%76.21%12.33%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
25.76%20.44%35.54%17.54%-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SVXY and CLSE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022

0.53

The correlation between SVXY and CLSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVXY vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVXY
SVXY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVXY vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVXYCLSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.67

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

10.55

-9.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

39.58

-34.80

SVXY vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVXY Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVXY and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVXYCLSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

3.84

-2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.59

-1.38

Drawdowns

SVXY vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVXY drawdown since its inception was -95.25%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVXY and CLSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVXYCLSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.25%

-16.45%

-78.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.94%

-4.85%

-18.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.45%

-16.45%

-30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.15%

0.00%

-80.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-3.59%

-53.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

1.29%

+5.71%

Volatility

SVXY vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) is 3.76%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that SVXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVXYCLSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

4.31%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.42%

10.21%

+11.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.62%

13.32%

+15.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.38%

13.88%

+21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.75%

13.88%

+36.87%

SVXY vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVXY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVXY vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

SVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.76%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%
SVXY
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVXY and CLSE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLSE has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SVXY (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVXY dropped -95.25% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

On 3-year performance, CLSE leads with 32.39% vs 13.21% for SVXY. On fees, SVXY is cheaper at 1.38% per year. On volatility, SVXY has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 32.39% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SVXY is cheaper with a 1.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.56% for CLSE.

CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for SVXY.

SVXY is categorized as Volatility, while CLSE is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for SVXY and 1.56% for CLSE.

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVXY and CLSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer