PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVXY vs. VIXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVXY vs. VIXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) and ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVXY achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than VIXM's -5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SVXY has outperformed VIXM with an annualized return of -0.01%, while VIXM has yielded a comparatively lower -11.64% annualized return.


SVXY

1D
-1.50%
1M
5.03%
6M
2.34%
YTD
4.12%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
15.62%
10Y*
-0.01%

VIXM

1D
0.49%
1M
-5.64%
6M
-3.49%
YTD
-5.83%
1Y
-13.43%
3Y*
-9.98%
5Y*
-14.38%
10Y*
-11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVXY vs. VIXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVXY
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
4.12%10.63%-3.17%76.21%-4.66%48.53%-36.47%54.21%-91.75%181.84%
VIXM
ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF
-5.83%5.60%-13.67%-44.83%-0.69%-16.70%72.38%-20.38%26.43%-50.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SVXY and VIXM is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

-0.89

The correlation between SVXY and VIXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVXY vs. VIXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVXY
SVXY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VIXM
VIXM Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
VIXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIXM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VIXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIXM Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVXY vs. VIXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) and ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SVXYVIXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.89

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.70

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

-1.46

+5.91

SVXY vs. VIXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVXY Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the VIXM Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVXY and VIXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVXY vs. VIXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVXY drawdown since its inception was -95.25%, roughly equal to the maximum VIXM drawdown of -96.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVXY and VIXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVXYVIXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.25%

-96.23%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.94%

-19.16%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.45%

-37.26%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.45%

-63.40%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.25%

-72.55%

-22.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.14%

-96.05%

+16.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.01%

-81.59%

+24.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

9.23%

-2.20%

Volatility

SVXY vs. VIXM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) at 3.55%. This indicates that SVXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVXYVIXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

3.55%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.81%

14.02%

+8.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.92%

18.66%

+10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.34%

30.60%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.50%

32.63%

+16.87%

SVXY vs. VIXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVXY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VIXM's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVXY vs. VIXM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SVXY nor VIXM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SVXY and VIXM have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVXY has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to VIXM (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVXY dropped -95.25% vs VIXM's -96.23%.

On 10-year performance, SVXY leads with -0.01% vs -11.64% for VIXM. On fees, VIXM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, VIXM has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SVXY has performed better with a -0.01% return vs -11.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIXM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SVXY.

SVXY and VIXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index (-0.5x), while VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SVXY and 0.85% for VIXM.

SVXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVXY and VIXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer