SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO
SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while AII.TO (Almonty Industries Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO returned 12.54%/yr vs 48.01%/yr for AII.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than AII.TO's 94.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO has underperformed AII.TO with an annualized return of 12.54%, while AII.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 48.01% annualized return.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -19.40%
- YTD
- -14.35%
- 6M
- -19.83%
- 1Y
- 70.15%
- 3Y*
- 39.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
AII.TO
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -14.19%
- YTD
- 94.37%
- 6M
- 93.56%
- 1Y
- 132.74%
- 3Y*
- 196.50%
- 5Y*
- 71.64%
- 10Y*
- 48.01%
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -14.35% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.69% | -13.03% | 43.88% | 9.28% | -2.35% | -2.30% |
AII.TO Almonty Industries Inc. | 94.37% | 784.25% | 68.52% | -20.59% | -23.60% | 39.06% | 52.38% | -35.38% | 18.18% | 103.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and AII.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, SVR-C.TO and AII.TO have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
AII.TO
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVR-C.TO | AII.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.44 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 5.06 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, smaller than the maximum AII.TO drawdown of -80.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and AII.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | AII.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.26% | -80.14% | +26.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.86% | -54.79% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.86% | -54.79% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.86% | -59.43% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.86% | -68.52% | +19.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.01% | -26.85% | -20.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -33.47% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.60% | 26.31% | -3.71% |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) is 15.32%, while Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a volatility of 31.36%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AII.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | AII.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.32% | 31.36% | -16.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.48% | 67.35% | -10.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.58% | 98.99% | -40.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.84% | 74.65% | -38.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 75.28% | -43.55% |
Dividends
SVR-C.TO vs. AII.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SVR-C.TO nor AII.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR-C.TO and AII.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and AII.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer