SVOL vs. SCHG
SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. SVOL is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVOL returned 6.66%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for SCHG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SVOL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
SVOL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVOL achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.75% return.
SVOL
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
SVOL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | -0.84% | 2.41% | 6.77% | 22.88% | -3.30% | 12.70% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 25.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVOL and SCHG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SVOL and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
SVOL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SVOL
SCHG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SVOL
SCHG
Financial Services
SVOL
SCHG
Industrials
SVOL
SCHG
Healthcare
SVOL
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
SVOL
SCHG
Communication Services
SVOL
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
SVOL
SCHG
Energy
SVOL
SCHG
Real Estate
SVOL
SCHG
Basic Materials
SVOL
SCHG
Utilities
SVOL
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVOL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
SVOL
SCHG
SVOL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVOL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.27 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 4.25 | -2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVOL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.33 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.67 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.83 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
SVOL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVOL drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOL and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVOL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -34.59% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -16.41% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.50% | -23.39% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.50% | -34.59% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -4.25% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -5.20% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 4.91% | +0.58% |
Volatility
SVOL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) is 2.77%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that SVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVOL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 4.52% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 12.02% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 15.77% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 22.31% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 21.58% | +0.34% |
SVOL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVOL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVOL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.19%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 22.19% | 19.82% | 16.79% | 16.36% | 18.32% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVOL and SCHG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to SVOL (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVOL dropped -33.50% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 14.90% vs 6.66% for SVOL. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SVOL.
SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.19%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
SVOL is categorized as Volatility, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SVOL and 0.04% for SCHG.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVOL and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer