PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVOAX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (SVOAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVOAX achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SVOAX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 8.82%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


SVOAX

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.17%
YTD
4.43%
6M
5.17%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
8.82%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVOAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
4.43%10.47%15.46%3.68%-1.10%19.77%-2.15%24.17%-2.75%14.04%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SVOAX and FASGX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2004

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between SVOAX and FASGX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVOAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVOAX
SVOAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SVOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SVOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (SVOAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVOAXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.49

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.39

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

14.98

-9.43

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVOAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVOAX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVOAXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.61

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.69

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.79

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Drawdowns

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVOAX drawdown since its inception was -47.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOAX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVOAXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.22%

-47.35%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-7.95%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.19%

-12.80%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.19%

-23.54%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.09%

-27.20%

-6.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

0.00%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-6.71%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.79%

-0.11%

Volatility

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (SVOAX) is 2.01%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that SVOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVOAXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

3.30%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

8.39%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

10.34%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

12.27%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

12.65%

+3.51%

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVOAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVOAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

SVOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.29%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
SVOAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
16.29%16.95%17.05%13.66%11.01%18.42%1.47%4.66%13.86%9.21%4.35%6.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVOAX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to SVOAX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVOAX dropped -47.22% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVOAX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer