SVM vs. SNAP
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) and SNAP (Snap Inc.) are both stocks. SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while SNAP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, SVM returned 13.01%/yr vs -39.35%/yr for SNAP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. SNAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than SNAP's -34.82% return.
SVM
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 6M
- 39.13%
- 1Y
- 164.75%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.41%
SNAP
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -34.82%
- 6M
- -28.04%
- 1Y
- -33.75%
- 3Y*
- -20.12%
- 5Y*
- -39.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SVM vs. SNAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 35.63% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | -34.52% |
SNAP Snap Inc. | -34.82% | -25.07% | -36.39% | 89.16% | -80.97% | -6.07% | 206.61% | 196.37% | -62.29% | -39.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and SNAP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
SVM:
$2.50B
SNAP:
$8.88B
SVM:
-$0.05
SNAP:
-$0.24
SVM:
5.67
SNAP:
1.46
SVM:
2.65
SNAP:
4.26
SVM:
$437.11M
SNAP:
$6.10B
SVM:
$254.02M
SNAP:
$3.40B
SVM:
$185.32M
SNAP:
-$173.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. SNAP — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
SNAP
SVM vs. SNAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Snap Inc. (SNAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.91 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | -0.59 | +4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | -1.06 | +13.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. SNAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SNAP drawdown of -95.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and SNAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -95.27% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -62.03% | +23.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -77.48% | +34.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.76% | -95.27% | +28.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.85% | -93.67% | +50.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.64% | -60.04% | -11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 34.45% | -21.15% |
Volatility
SVM vs. SNAP - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to Snap Inc. (SNAP) at 12.67%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.97% | 12.67% | +14.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.61% | 41.17% | +15.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.31% | 55.41% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 75.96% | -20.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.77% | 71.73% | -9.96% |
Dividends
SVM vs. SNAP - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while SNAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAP Snap Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SVM vs. SNAP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and Snap Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVM vs. SNAP - Profitability Comparison
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
SNAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.55M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
SNAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported an operating income of -74.45M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.9%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
SNAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a net income of -88.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and SNAP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (26.97%) compared to SNAP (12.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs SNAP's -95.27%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and SNAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer