PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVAAX vs. VPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVAAX vs. VPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAAX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than VPU's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SVAAX has underperformed VPU with an annualized return of 7.83%, while VPU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.02% annualized return.


SVAAX

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.60%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
7.83%

VPU

1D
-0.58%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
3.18%
6M
1.27%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
9.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVAAX vs. VPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
8.72%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
3.18%16.46%23.04%-7.45%1.06%17.40%-0.74%24.89%4.38%12.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAAX and VPU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between SVAAX and VPU has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVAAX vs. VPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VPU
VPU Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPU Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVAAX vs. VPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVAAXVPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.12

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

1.08

+3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.74

2.43

+11.30

SVAAX vs. VPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the VPU Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAAX and VPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVAAXVPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.67

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.54

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Drawdowns

SVAAX vs. VPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAAX drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than VPU's maximum drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAAX and VPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVAAXVPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.16%

-46.31%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-8.90%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-17.34%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-25.15%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

-36.42%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-7.26%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-7.78%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.96%

-1.36%

Volatility

SVAAX vs. VPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) is 3.60%, while Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that SVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVAAXVPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.35%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

11.36%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

14.30%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

17.05%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

19.12%

-3.73%

SVAAX vs. VPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VPU's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVAAX vs. VPU - Dividend Comparison

SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than VPU's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.88%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.69%2.73%3.02%3.49%2.98%2.70%3.17%2.83%3.23%3.18%3.19%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVAAX and VPU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPU has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to SVAAX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAAX dropped -51.16% vs VPU's -46.31%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVAAX and VPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer