FGSKX vs. DISV
FGSKX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) are both funds - FGSKX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FGSKX returned 15.86%/yr vs 22.91%/yr for DISV. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FGSKX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for DISV.
Performance
FGSKX vs. DISV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSKX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than DISV's 13.10% return.
FGSKX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- -1.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.81%
DISV
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 32.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.18M | $14.28M | $13.10M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGSKX vs. DISV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -0.65% | 10.90% | 33.36% | 27.45% | -14.52% |
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 13.10% | 47.42% | 5.87% | 19.52% | -9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSKX and DISV is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FGSKX and DISV has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSKX vs. DISV — Risk / Return Rank
FGSKX
DISV
FGSKX vs. DISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGSKX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.38 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.55 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 8.98 | -9.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGSKX vs. DISV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSKX drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than DISV's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSKX and DISV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSKX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -26.77% | -28.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -12.69% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.47% | -14.15% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -0.52% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -4.84% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 3.60% | +1.93% |
Volatility
FGSKX vs. DISV - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) at 4.03%. This indicates that FGSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DISV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGSKX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 4.03% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 12.65% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 14.92% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 17.28% | +5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 17.28% | +5.06% |
FGSKX vs. DISV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSKX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than DISV's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSKX vs. DISV - Dividend Comparison
FGSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than DISV's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.44% | 2.69% | 2.77% | 2.73% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 5.40% | 5.37% | 4.70% | 0.00% | 2.52% | 28.15% | 7.60% | 8.72% | 15.47% | 14.82% | 0.89% | 26.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGSKX and DISV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGSKX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to DISV (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSKX dropped -55.05% vs DISV's -26.77%.
DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGSKX and DISV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer