FGSKX vs. QKACX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FGSKX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and QKACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - FGSKX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Federated Hermes, while QKACX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated Hermes. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGSKX returned 15.52%/yr vs 17.00%/yr for QKACX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGSKX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for QKACX.

Performance

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSKX achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than QKACX's 8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSKX has underperformed QKACX with an annualized return of 15.52%, while QKACX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.00% annualized return.

FGSKX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 6.58%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 15.52%

QKACX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: 25.34%
• 5Y*: 15.99%
• 10Y*: 17.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	2.62%	10.90%	33.36%	27.45%	-24.38%	22.74%	35.92%	28.35%	-3.00%	24.68%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	8.05%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	31.45%	22.00%	26.88%	-2.65%	21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FGSKX and QKACX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.93

The correlation between FGSKX and QKACX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGSKX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSKX

FGSKX Risk / Return Rank: 6
FGSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FGSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FGSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FGSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FGSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 60
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGSKX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	2.13	-1.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	3.09	-2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.45	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.94	-2.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	13.79	-12.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the QKACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSKX and QKACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGSKX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	2.13	-1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.92	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.91	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.48	-0.04

Drawdowns

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSKX drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, smaller than the maximum QKACX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSKX and QKACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGSKX	QKACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.05%	-60.51%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-8.66%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.47%	-19.42%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.68%	-23.05%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.16%	-36.47%	-0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	0.00%	-2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.86%	-11.21%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	1.85%	+3.23%

Volatility

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) at 2.55%. This indicates that FGSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QKACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGSKX	QKACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	2.55%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.95%	9.51%	+4.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	11.99%	+5.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.42%	17.37%	+5.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.38%	18.70%	+3.68%

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSKX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGSKX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison

FGSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than QKACX's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	5.23%	5.37%	4.70%	0.00%	2.52%	28.15%	7.60%	8.72%	15.47%	14.82%	0.89%	26.74%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.37%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGSKX and QKACX in my portfolio?

FGSKX and QKACX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGSKX or QKACX?

FGSKX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to QKACX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSKX dropped -55.05% vs QKACX's -60.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QKACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.