PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVAAX vs. EQIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (EQIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAAX achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly lower than EQIIX's 17.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SVAAX having a 8.12% annualized return and EQIIX not far behind at 7.93%.


SVAAX

1D
-1.50%
1M
2.45%
6M
9.65%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
8.12%
ALL TIME*
7.75%

EQIIX

1D
4.01%
1M
-3.66%
6M
7.18%
YTD
17.89%
1Y
36.57%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
7.93%
ALL TIME*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
15.31%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%
EQIIX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
17.89%28.19%10.95%12.25%-17.91%3.12%7.70%16.90%-11.38%24.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAAX and EQIIX is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012

0.41

The correlation between SVAAX and EQIIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVAAX vs. EQIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EQIIX
EQIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (EQIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SVAAXEQIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.91

2.40

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

7.17

+8.53

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the EQIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAAX and EQIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAAX drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than EQIIX's maximum drawdown of -38.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAAX and EQIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVAAXEQIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.16%

-38.13%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-13.94%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-17.64%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-29.25%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

-38.13%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-10.48%

+8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-10.15%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

4.66%

-2.97%

Volatility

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) is 4.57%, while Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (EQIIX) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that SVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVAAXEQIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

8.35%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

18.59%

-9.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

20.78%

-9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

16.24%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

16.65%

-1.21%

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EQIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVAAX vs. EQIIX - Dividend Comparison

SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than EQIIX's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQIIX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
2.28%2.58%2.08%2.53%2.70%2.92%1.79%2.46%2.87%1.80%2.77%2.38%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.62%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVAAX and EQIIX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQIIX has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to SVAAX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAAX dropped -51.16% vs EQIIX's -38.13%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVAAX and EQIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer