EQIIX vs. AMT
EQIIX (Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) is Dividend fund managed by Allspring, while AMT (American Tower Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EQIIX returned 7.93%/yr vs 6.72%/yr for AMT. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EQIIX vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQIIX achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EQIIX has outperformed AMT with an annualized return of 7.93%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.72% annualized return.
EQIIX
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 36.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.09%
AMT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- -15.11%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $617.52M | $543.49M | $581.60M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EQIIX vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQIIX Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.89% | 28.19% | 10.95% | 12.25% | -17.91% | 3.12% | 7.70% | 16.90% | -11.38% | 24.97% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 0.68% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQIIX and AMT is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012 | 0.23 |
The correlation between EQIIX and AMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQIIX vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank
EQIIX
AMT
EQIIX vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (EQIIX) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQIIX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.93 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | -0.65 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | -1.02 | +8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQIIX vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQIIX drawdown since its inception was -38.13%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQIIX and AMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQIIX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.13% | -98.70% | +60.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -20.94% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -28.40% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.25% | -45.34% | +16.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.13% | -45.34% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -33.24% | +22.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -27.05% | +16.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 13.38% | -8.72% |
Volatility
EQIIX vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (EQIIX) and American Tower Corporation (AMT) have volatilities of 8.35% and 8.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQIIX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 8.09% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 21.36% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 25.68% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 26.84% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 26.41% | -9.76% |
Dividends
EQIIX vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
EQIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than AMT's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 4.03% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
EQIIX Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 2.28% | 2.58% | 2.08% | 2.53% | 2.70% | 2.92% | 1.79% | 2.46% | 2.87% | 1.80% | 2.77% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQIIX and AMT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQIIX has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to AMT (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQIIX dropped -38.13% vs AMT's -98.70%.
EQIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQIIX and AMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer