PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSL vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSL vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSL achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


SUSL

1D
-0.94%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.06%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSL vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
9.27%18.97%23.51%29.08%-20.22%31.53%18.89%16.29%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSL and MFUS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.84

The correlation between SUSL and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUSL vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSL
MFUS

Technology

36.9%
21.8%

Communication Services

14.5%
5.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.6%

Healthcare

9.6%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.6%

Industrials

8.1%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
10.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.8%

Energy

2.1%
7.0%

Utilities

1.1%
1.7%

Technology

SUSL
36.9%
MFUS
21.8%

Communication Services

SUSL
14.5%
MFUS
5.3%

Financial Services

SUSL
10.6%
MFUS
12.6%

Healthcare

SUSL
9.6%
MFUS
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSL
8.6%
MFUS
10.6%

Industrials

SUSL
8.1%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

SUSL
4.2%
MFUS
10.3%

Real Estate

SUSL
2.2%
MFUS
1.8%

Basic Materials

SUSL
2.1%
MFUS
2.8%

Energy

SUSL
2.1%
MFUS
7.0%

Utilities

SUSL
1.1%
MFUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSL vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSL
SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSL vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSLMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.41

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

18.13

-7.63

SUSL vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSL and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSLMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.63

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.86

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.79

+0.06

Drawdowns

SUSL vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSL drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSL and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSLMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-35.21%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-6.39%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-15.39%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-18.22%

-8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

0.00%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.00%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.55%

+1.09%

Volatility

SUSL vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that SUSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSLMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.19%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

8.22%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

10.72%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

15.03%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

17.35%

+2.45%

SUSL vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUSL vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

SUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
0.93%0.99%1.10%1.27%1.57%1.12%1.38%1.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSL and MFUS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUSL has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSL dropped -34.26% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, SUSL leads with 13.77% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, SUSL is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSL is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.93% for SUSL.

SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SUSL and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSL and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer