SUSB vs. PCL
SUSB (iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF) and PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. SUSB is passively managed, while PCL is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUSB charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PCL.
Performance
SUSB vs. PCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than PCL's 2.74% return.
SUSB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
PCL
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUSB vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 2.80% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 2.74% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSB and PCL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSB vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank
SUSB
PCL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SUSB vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUSB | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUSB vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than PCL's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and PCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSB | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -5.14% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.24% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -1.72% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
SUSB vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSB | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 7.85% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 7.85% | -4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 7.85% | -4.14% |
SUSB vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSB vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison
SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than PCL's 5.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.24% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.40% | 3.81% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.83% | 2.61% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSB and PCL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.49% for SUSB.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.25% for PCL.
Find the right allocation for SUSB and PCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer