SUSA vs. TLT
SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SUSA returned 15.03%/yr vs -1.56%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. SUSA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
SUSA vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSA has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 15.03%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.56% annualized return.
SUSA
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
TLT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- -1.67%
- 5Y*
- -6.27%
- 10Y*
- -1.56%
SUSA vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 11.51% | 15.72% | 22.43% | 23.88% | -21.38% | 30.45% | 24.66% | 32.10% | -5.67% | 22.52% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.05% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSA and TLT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | -0.22 |
The correlation between SUSA and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSA vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
SUSA
TLT
SUSA vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.07 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 0.46 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 1.14 | +11.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 0.36 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | -0.40 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | -0.11 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.26 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SUSA vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.93% | -48.35% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -7.58% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -19.18% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -43.70% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.93% | -48.35% | +15.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -40.31% | +39.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -13.82% | +6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.05% | -0.86% |
Volatility
SUSA vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.71%. This indicates that SUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 2.71% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 6.50% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 9.77% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.86% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 14.90% | +3.25% |
SUSA vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSA vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than TLT's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 0.82% | 0.89% | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.42% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSA and TLT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUSA has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to TLT (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, SUSA leads with 15.03% vs -1.56% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 15.03% return vs -1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.82% for SUSA.
SUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.15% for TLT.
SUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSA and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer