SUSA vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SUSA is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSA returned 11.07%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUSA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

SUSA vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 8.26% return.

SUSA

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 22.28%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 15.15%

TDVG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSA vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF	8.89%	15.72%	22.43%	23.88%	-21.38%	30.45%	15.57%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.26%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	26.20%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSA and TDVG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020	0.90

The correlation between SUSA and TDVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUSA vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUSA	TDVG
Technology	40.0%	26.2%
Financial Services	11.6%	19.3%
Industrials	9.0%	13.6%
Healthcare	8.8%	12.4%
Communication Services	7.9%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	6.9%
Energy	3.5%	5.3%
Real Estate	2.8%	1.6%
Basic Materials	2.3%	2.8%
Utilities	1.9%	3.8%

Return for Risk

SUSA vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSA

SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 56
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 61

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSA vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUSA	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.75	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.51	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.35	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	9.64	+0.23

SUSA vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSA and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUSA vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUSA	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.93%	-19.20%	-34.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-7.24%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	-14.02%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.23%	-19.20%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-0.61%	-2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.23%	-3.72%	-3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	1.76%	+0.50%

Volatility

SUSA vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.70%. This indicates that SUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUSA	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	2.70%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	7.60%	+2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.95%	9.76%	+3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	13.92%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	13.90%	+4.27%

SUSA vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUSA vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF	0.86%	0.89%	1.15%	1.32%	1.52%	0.98%	1.17%	1.52%	1.72%	1.40%	1.56%	1.42%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUSA and TDVG in my portfolio?

SUSA and TDVG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUSA or TDVG?

SUSA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to TDVG (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, SUSA or TDVG?

On 5-year performance, SUSA leads with 11.07% vs 10.13% for TDVG. On fees, SUSA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUSA or TDVG?

Over the 5-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUSA or TDVG?

SUSA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUSA or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.86% for SUSA.

What is the main difference between SUSA and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.