SUSA vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SUSA tracks the MSCI USA ESG Select Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SUSA returned 15.15%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUSA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

SUSA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.15%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return.

SUSA

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 22.28%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 15.15%

SCHG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -4.04%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 22.08%
• 5Y*: 13.26%
• 10Y*: 18.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF	8.89%	15.72%	22.43%	23.88%	-21.38%	30.45%	24.66%	32.10%	-5.67%	22.52%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.23%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSA and SCHG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.91

The correlation between SUSA and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUSA	SCHG
Technology	40.0%	46.7%
Financial Services	11.6%	6.6%
Industrials	9.0%	6.0%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.4%
Communication Services	7.9%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	1.6%
Energy	3.5%	0.7%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.3%
Utilities	1.9%	0.4%

Return for Risk

SUSA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSA

SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 56
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 61

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 27
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUSA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.00	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.42	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.18	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	0.98	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	3.19	+6.67

SUSA vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSA and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUSA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUSA	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.93%	-34.59%	-19.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-16.41%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	-23.39%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.23%	-34.59%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.93%	-34.59%	+1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-6.57%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.23%	-5.20%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	5.03%	-2.77%

Volatility

SUSA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) is 5.01%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that SUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUSA	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	5.90%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	12.46%	-2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.95%	16.21%	-3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	22.38%	-4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	21.58%	-3.41%

SUSA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUSA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF	0.86%	0.89%	1.15%	1.32%	1.52%	0.98%	1.17%	1.52%	1.72%	1.40%	1.56%	1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUSA and SCHG in my portfolio?

SUSA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUSA or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to SUSA (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, SUSA or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.63% vs 15.15% for SUSA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SUSA has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUSA or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 15.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUSA or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUSA or SCHG?

SUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SUSA and SCHG?

SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.