SUPP vs. SPXM
SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUPP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
SUPP vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SUPP
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 21.75%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 28.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUPP vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 21.75% | 3.88% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPP and SPXM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPP vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
SUPP
SPXM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SUPP vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUPP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUPP vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -5.08% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -0.75% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -0.78% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility
SUPP vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 7.87% | +13.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 7.87% | +11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 7.87% | +11.98% |
SUPP vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUPP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUPP vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.49% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPP and SPXM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.
SUPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUPP and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for SUPP and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer