SUPP vs. GRW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

SUPP vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SUPP

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -5.19%
• 6M: 9.41%
• YTD: 13.80%
• 1Y: 15.25%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.23%

GRW

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	$173.33K	$124.39K	$212.92K
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	$10.33K	$10.54K	$22.91K

SUPP vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	-3.83%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPP and GRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.70

SUPP vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUPP	GRW
Industrials	51.8%	41.5%
Technology	38.4%	26.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	7.5%
Basic Materials	4.0%	3.9%
Communication Services	-	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	8.8%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SUPP vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUPP

SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 28
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GRW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUPP vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUPP	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.36	—	—

Drawdowns

SUPP vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPP	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.03%	-4.12%	-20.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-1.85%	-8.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.44%	-1.73%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SUPP	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.83%	15.72%	+7.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	15.72%	+4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.23%	15.72%	+4.51%

SUPP vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUPP and GRW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

SUPP vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	0.31%	0.35%	0.49%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPP and GRW in my portfolio?

SUPP and GRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SUPP or GRW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPP or GRW?

SUPP and GRW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPP or GRW?

SUPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between SUPP and GRW?

SUPP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities.