SUPP vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SUPP is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPP returned 19.75%/yr vs 16.52%/yr for FTIF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUPP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

SUPP vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPP achieves a 21.99% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 26.01% return.

SUPP

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 21.99%
• 6M: 19.43%
• 1Y: 32.25%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 26.01%
• 6M: 24.50%
• 1Y: 37.61%
• 3Y*: 16.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPP vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	21.99%	11.65%	10.95%	19.27%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	26.01%	7.79%	0.50%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPP and FTIF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023	0.64

The correlation between SUPP and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUPP vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUPP	FTIF
Industrials	51.2%	16.5%
Technology	37.9%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	3.2%
Basic Materials	4.2%	20.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	44.1%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	12.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SUPP vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPP

SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 50
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 83
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPP vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUPP	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.53	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	3.47	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.44	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	6.92	-4.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	20.52	-10.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUPP vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPP and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUPP	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	2.53	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.76	+0.15

Drawdowns

SUPP vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPP	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.03%	-27.83%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.59%	-5.46%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.03%	-27.83%	+2.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-6.00%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	1.84%	+1.45%

Volatility

SUPP vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 3.95%. This indicates that SUPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPP	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	3.95%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.42%	10.53%	+5.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.34%	14.94%	+4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.43%	18.95%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	18.95%	+0.48%

SUPP vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUPP vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than FTIF's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.11%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	0.29%	0.35%	0.49%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPP and FTIF in my portfolio?

SUPP and FTIF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPP or FTIF?

SUPP has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to FTIF (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPP dropped -25.03% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, SUPP or FTIF?

On 3-year performance, SUPP leads with 19.75% vs 16.52% for FTIF. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUPP or FTIF?

Over the 3-year period, SUPP has performed better with a 19.75% return vs 16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPP or FTIF?

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPP or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.29% for SUPP.

What is the main difference between SUPP and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUPP and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.