SUPL vs. XLII
SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. SUPL is passively managed, while XLII is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLII.
Performance
SUPL vs. XLII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPL achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly higher than XLII's 6.89% return.
SUPL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 18.43%
- 6M
- 21.89%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLII
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUPL vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | 18.43% | 7.85% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.89% | 6.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPL and XLII is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.70 |
SUPL vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUPL
XLII
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
SUPL
XLII
-
Energy
SUPL
XLII
-
Healthcare
SUPL
XLII
-
Utilities
SUPL
XLII
-
Technology
SUPL
XLII
-
Basic Materials
SUPL
-
XLII
-
Communication Services
SUPL
-
XLII
-
Consumer Cyclical
SUPL
-
XLII
-
Consumer Defensive
SUPL
-
XLII
-
Financial Services
SUPL
-
XLII
Real Estate
SUPL
-
XLII
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPL vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank
SUPL
XLII
SUPL vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUPL | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUPL | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.46 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
SUPL vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and XLII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPL | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -10.10% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -1.35% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
SUPL vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPL | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 11.57% | +4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 11.57% | +7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 11.57% | +7.37% |
SUPL vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUPL vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison
SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than XLII's 11.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | 2.65% | 3.03% | 4.78% | 4.71% | 3.00% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.27% | 5.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPL and XLII have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SUPL.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 2.65% for SUPL.
SUPL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.35% for XLII.
Find the right allocation for SUPL and XLII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer