SUPL vs. SHPP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - SUPL tracks the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net while SHPP tracks the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPL returned 8.11%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for SHPP. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SHPP.

Performance

SUPL vs. SHPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SUPL having a 17.34% return and SHPP slightly higher at 18.08%.

SUPL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 12.59%
• YTD: 17.34%
• 1Y: 28.91%
• 3Y*: 8.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.69%

SHPP

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.57%
• 6M: 14.15%
• YTD: 18.08%
• 1Y: 27.78%
• 3Y*: 10.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	$5.70K	$6.05K	$3.27K
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	$76.25K	$64.52K	$42.91K

SUPL vs. SHPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	17.34%	9.25%	-2.44%	23.69%	-9.40%
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	18.08%	12.88%	0.76%	20.86%	-4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPL and SHPP is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022	0.92

The correlation between SUPL and SHPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUPL vs. SHPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUPL	SHPP
Industrials	57.1%	85.9%
Energy	4.9%	-
Healthcare	4.3%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-
Technology	1.9%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SUPL vs. SHPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUPL

SUPL Risk / Return Rank: 73
SUPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SUPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SUPL Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SUPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SUPL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SHPP

SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 73
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUPL vs. SHPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUPL	SHPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.74	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.41	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	2.40	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.01	9.36	-0.35

SUPL vs. SHPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SHPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPL and SHPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUPL vs. SHPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, which is greater than SHPP's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and SHPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPL	SHPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-21.57%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-11.06%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	-18.84%	-2.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-0.96%	-3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-4.16%	-1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.82%	+0.24%

Volatility

SUPL vs. SHPP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) at 2.87%. This indicates that SUPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPL	SHPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	2.87%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.31%	12.54%	+0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.56%	15.30%	+1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	17.33%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.89%	17.33%	+1.56%

SUPL vs. SHPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SHPP's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUPL vs. SHPP - Dividend Comparison

SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than SHPP's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	1.69%	1.80%	2.41%	2.89%	1.15%
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	2.51%	3.03%	4.78%	4.71%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPL and SHPP in my portfolio?

SUPL and SHPP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPL or SHPP?

SUPL has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SHPP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPL dropped -24.42% vs SHPP's -21.57%.

Which ETF is better, SUPL or SHPP?

On 3-year performance, SHPP leads with 10.45% vs 8.11% for SUPL. On fees, SUPL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SHPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUPL or SHPP?

Over the 3-year period, SHPP has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPL or SHPP?

SUPL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPL or SHPP?

SUPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.69% for SHPP.

What is the main difference between SUPL and SHPP?

SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.61% for SHPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.