STXV vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXV returned 18.59%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for FNDF. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

STXV vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.97% return.

STXV

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 29.06%
• 3Y*: 18.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXV vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	13.51%	16.26%	13.34%	9.28%	-1.46%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.97%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between STXV and FNDF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022	0.66

The correlation between STXV and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXV vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXV	FNDF
Financial Services	21.1%	16.7%
Healthcare	16.5%	5.5%
Technology	12.8%	11.1%
Energy	11.2%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	6.9%
Industrials	7.7%	15.9%
Utilities	6.2%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	10.7%
Communication Services	4.5%	4.9%
Real Estate	3.4%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.1%	11.3%

Return for Risk

STXV vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXV

STXV Risk / Return Rank: 88
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXV vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXV	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	2.94	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	3.83	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.52	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.03	4.17	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.31	15.91	+2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXV vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXV and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXV	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	2.94	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.54	+0.56

Drawdowns

STXV vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXV	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-40.14%	+25.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-10.60%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.80%	-13.89%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.87%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-7.64%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.77%	-1.18%

Volatility

STXV vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.06%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXV	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	5.10%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.07%	12.53%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.10%	15.04%	-4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.22%	16.18%	-2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.22%	17.67%	-4.45%

STXV vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STXV vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	2.22%	2.37%	2.36%	2.05%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXV and FNDF in my portfolio?

STXV and FNDF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXV or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to STXV (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, STXV or FNDF?

On 3-year performance, FNDF leads with 24.21% vs 18.59% for STXV. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXV or FNDF?

Over the 3-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 18.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXV or FNDF?

STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXV or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.22% for STXV.

What is the main difference between STXV and FNDF?

STXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Strive and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.