STXK vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - STXK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXK returned 14.35%/yr vs 28.48%/yr for TNA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STXK charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

STXK vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 57.67% return.

STXK

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 12.02%
• 1Y: 29.19%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TNA

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 57.67%
• 6M: 48.66%
• 1Y: 134.58%
• 3Y*: 28.48%
• 5Y*: -3.46%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXK vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	13.75%	7.82%	9.47%	20.15%	-3.32%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	57.67%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between STXK and TNA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022	0.97

The correlation between STXK and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXK vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXK	TNA
Technology	17.3%	19.1%
Financial Services	15.9%	15.3%
Industrials	14.9%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	8.0%
Healthcare	12.9%	16.3%
Real Estate	7.3%	5.9%
Energy	6.1%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.4%	4.7%
Utilities	3.0%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.3%
Communication Services	2.1%	2.4%

Return for Risk

STXK vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXK

STXK Risk / Return Rank: 56
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 49
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 61

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 69
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXK vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STXK	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.28	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.68	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	4.11	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	13.50	-3.18

STXK vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXK Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXK and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STXK vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXK	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.12%	-88.09%	+60.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.81%	-32.53%	+22.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.12%	-65.78%	+38.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-33.32%	+33.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-33.92%	+28.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	9.89%	-7.06%

Volatility

STXK vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) is 4.86%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that STXK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXK	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	20.47%	-15.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	42.66%	-30.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.98%	58.63%	-41.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.12%	67.58%	-47.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	68.58%	-48.46%

STXK vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXK vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	1.35%	1.29%	1.64%	1.14%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.38%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXK and TNA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, STXK and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, STXK or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to STXK (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, STXK or TNA?

On 3-year performance, TNA leads with 28.48% vs 14.35% for STXK. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXK or TNA?

Over the 3-year period, TNA has performed better with a 28.48% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXK or TNA?

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXK or TNA?

STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

What is the main difference between STXK and TNA?

STXK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Strive and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 1.05% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.