STXG vs. QUS
STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STXG tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXG returned 24.12%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
STXG vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 7.13% return.
STXG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
STXG vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 11.15% | 17.82% | 28.53% | 35.95% | -3.74% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 7.13% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXG and QUS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between STXG and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXG vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXG
QUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
STXG
QUS
Communication Services
STXG
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
STXG
QUS
Industrials
STXG
QUS
Financial Services
STXG
QUS
Healthcare
STXG
QUS
Consumer Defensive
STXG
QUS
Real Estate
STXG
QUS
Basic Materials
STXG
QUS
Utilities
STXG
QUS
Energy
STXG
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXG vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
STXG
QUS
STXG vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.06 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.94 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.77 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 12.37 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.06 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.77 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
STXG vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -33.78% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -6.85% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.22% | -13.94% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -3.70% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 1.53% | +1.58% |
Volatility
STXG vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.80%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 1.80% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 6.68% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 9.08% | +5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 14.32% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 16.42% | +1.11% |
STXG vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STXG vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.48% | 0.51% | 0.55% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXG and QUS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to QUS (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 3-year performance, STXG leads with 24.12% vs 17.71% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXG has performed better with a 24.12% return vs 17.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.45% for STXG.
STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Strive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.15% for QUS.
STXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXG and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer