STXG vs. IUSG
STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STXG tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth while IUSG tracks the Russell 3000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXG returned 23.77%/yr vs 27.59%/yr for IUSG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
STXG vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.08% return.
STXG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 27.66%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
STXG vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 10.21% | 17.82% | 28.53% | 35.95% | -3.74% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 14.08% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXG and IUSG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between STXG and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXG vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXG
IUSG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
STXG
IUSG
Communication Services
STXG
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
STXG
IUSG
Industrials
STXG
IUSG
Financial Services
STXG
IUSG
Healthcare
STXG
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
STXG
IUSG
Real Estate
STXG
IUSG
Basic Materials
STXG
IUSG
Utilities
STXG
IUSG
Energy
STXG
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXG vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
STXG
IUSG
STXG vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 2.17 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.65 | 2.93 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.61 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 11.09 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.17 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.38 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
STXG vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -63.41% | +42.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -13.07% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.22% | -22.28% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.98% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -21.44% | +18.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.06% | +0.05% |
Volatility
STXG vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) is 3.63%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that STXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.23% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 12.23% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 15.72% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 20.87% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 20.40% | -2.87% |
STXG vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STXG vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IUSG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.51% | 0.55% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, STXG and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to STXG (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 3-year performance, IUSG leads with 27.59% vs 23.77% for STXG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, STXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 27.59% return vs 23.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.46% for STXG.
STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXG and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer