PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXE vs. RNEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXE vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than RNEM's 3.95% return.


STXE

1D
2.93%
1M
-5.07%
6M
18.30%
YTD
31.48%
1Y
56.34%
3Y*
23.32%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.35%

RNEM

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.02%
6M
1.40%
YTD
3.95%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.85K$33.48K$54.35K
$412.67K$566.81K$571.67K

STXE vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
31.48%34.23%2.09%12.38%
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
3.95%15.58%-1.47%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between STXE and RNEM is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.70

The correlation between STXE and RNEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXE vs. RNEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXE
RNEM

Technology

40.3%
6.5%

Financial Services

15.7%
36.0%

Basic Materials

6.2%
13.8%

Industrials

5.0%
4.1%

Energy

3.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
10.0%

Utilities

1.1%
3.4%

Healthcare

0.6%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.8%

Technology

STXE
40.3%
RNEM
6.5%

Financial Services

STXE
15.7%
RNEM
36.0%

Basic Materials

STXE
6.2%
RNEM
13.8%

Industrials

STXE
5.0%
RNEM
4.1%

Energy

STXE
3.5%
RNEM
6.5%

Communication Services

STXE
3.2%
RNEM
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

STXE
1.7%
RNEM
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

STXE
1.4%
RNEM
10.0%

Utilities

STXE
1.1%
RNEM
3.4%

Healthcare

STXE
0.6%
RNEM
4.5%

Real Estate

STXE
0.4%
RNEM
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXE vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RNEM
RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STXE vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXERNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.14

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

0.87

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

2.31

+7.98

STXE vs. RNEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the RNEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXE and RNEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXE vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum RNEM drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and RNEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXERNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-38.38%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

-10.71%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-13.09%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.59%

-2.33%

-12.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-9.23%

+5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

4.04%

+1.35%

Volatility

STXE vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison

Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) at 3.15%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXERNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.05%

3.15%

+9.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.09%

10.89%

+17.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.83%

12.51%

+17.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

14.47%

+5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

17.14%

+3.03%

STXE vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXE vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison

STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than RNEM's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
2.28%2.75%3.45%1.63%2.99%3.20%3.01%2.85%2.85%2.28%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.91%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXE and RNEM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to RNEM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -20.38% vs RNEM's -38.38%.

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 6.73% for RNEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

RNEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.91% for STXE.

STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.75% for RNEM.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXE and RNEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer