STXD vs. SPTM
STXD (Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - STXD tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXD returned 15.13%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
STXD vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXD achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.
STXD
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
STXD vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | 5.65% | 14.79% | 14.51% | 13.94% | -0.18% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXD and SPTM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between STXD and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXD vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXD
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
STXD
SPTM
Financial Services
STXD
SPTM
Industrials
STXD
SPTM
Healthcare
STXD
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
STXD
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
STXD
SPTM
Real Estate
STXD
SPTM
Basic Materials
STXD
SPTM
Utilities
STXD
SPTM
Energy
STXD
SPTM
Communication Services
STXD
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXD vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
STXD
SPTM
STXD vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.36 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 3.23 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.43 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 3.22 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 15.01 | -6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.36 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.46 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
STXD vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXD drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXD and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -54.80% | +39.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -8.68% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.87% | -18.87% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -9.05% | +7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.86% | +0.37% |
Volatility
STXD vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.88% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 8.92% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 11.88% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 16.87% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 18.03% | -4.91% |
STXD vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXD vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
STXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | 1.20% | 1.15% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXD and SPTM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXD has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXD dropped -14.87% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 21.90% vs 15.13% for STXD. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for STXD.
STXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.
STXD tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for STXD and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXD and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer