STXD vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

STXD (Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. STXD is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXD returned 14.62%/yr vs 24.17%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

STXD vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXD achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.07% return.

STXD

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 4.74%
• 1Y: 16.12%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 11.07%
• 6M: 10.39%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXD vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF	5.46%	14.79%	14.51%	13.94%	1.51%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.07%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between STXD and CGDV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022	0.88

The correlation between STXD and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXD vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXD	CGDV
Technology	25.3%	33.1%
Financial Services	24.6%	6.6%
Industrials	16.0%	12.9%
Healthcare	12.7%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	6.0%
Real Estate	3.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	3.0%	2.8%
Utilities	2.2%	1.0%
Energy	0.2%	4.4%
Communication Services	0.1%	8.3%

Return for Risk

STXD vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXD

STXD Risk / Return Rank: 41
STXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
STXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
STXD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
STXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
STXD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 69
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXD vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STXD	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.23	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	3.06	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.41	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	2.81	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	13.07	-5.81

STXD vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXD Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXD and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STXD vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXD drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXD and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXD	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-21.82%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-9.75%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.87%	-14.28%	-0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-1.79%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-3.59%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.09%	+0.14%

Volatility

STXD vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) is 4.05%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that STXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXD	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	4.64%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	9.92%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	12.28%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.18%	15.57%	-2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.18%	15.57%	-2.39%

STXD vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXD vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

STXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.18%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF	1.20%	1.15%	1.23%	1.27%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXD and CGDV in my portfolio?

STXD and CGDV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXD or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to STXD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXD dropped -14.87% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, STXD or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.17% vs 14.62% for STXD. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, STXD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXD or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.17% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXD or CGDV?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for STXD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXD or CGDV?

STXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between STXD and CGDV?

STXD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for STXD and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.