STXD vs. FTWO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STXD (Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index, while FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STXD returned 16.82% vs 30.91% for FTWO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STXD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.

Performance

STXD vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXD achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than FTWO's 10.90% return.

STXD

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.58%
• 1Y: 16.82%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTWO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 10.90%
• 6M: 13.58%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXD vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF	5.63%	14.79%	14.51%	5.02%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	10.90%	43.06%	14.97%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between STXD and FTWO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023	0.55

The correlation between STXD and FTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXD vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXD	FTWO
Technology	28.4%	-
Financial Services	23.6%	-
Industrials	15.1%	32.2%
Healthcare	12.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	1.2%
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	25.9%
Utilities	2.4%	11.7%
Energy	0.2%	29.1%
Communication Services	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

STXD vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXD

STXD Risk / Return Rank: 41
STXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
STXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
STXD Omega Ratio Rank: 39
STXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
STXD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 49
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXD vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXD	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.72	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.33	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.69	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.57	7.23	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXD vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXD Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXD and FTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXD	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.72	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.31	-0.26

Drawdowns

STXD vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXD drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum FTWO drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXD and FTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXD	FTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-18.17%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-11.54%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-9.19%	+9.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.00%	-3.43%	+1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	4.29%	-2.06%

Volatility

STXD vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) is 2.86%, while Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that STXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXD	FTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	5.79%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.86%	14.59%	-5.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.49%	18.09%	-6.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.11%	19.23%	-6.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.11%	19.23%	-6.12%

STXD vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXD vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

STXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than FTWO's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.01%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF	1.20%	1.15%	1.23%	1.27%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXD and FTWO in my portfolio?

STXD and FTWO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXD or FTWO?

FTWO has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to STXD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXD dropped -14.87% vs FTWO's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, STXD or FTWO?

On 1-year performance, FTWO leads with 30.91% vs 16.82% for STXD. On fees, STXD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, STXD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXD or FTWO?

Over the 1-year period, FTWO has performed better with a 30.91% return vs 16.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXD or FTWO?

STXD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXD or FTWO?

STXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.01% for FTWO.

What is the main difference between STXD and FTWO?

STXD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FTWO is Energy Equities. STXD tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index, while FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for STXD and 0.49% for FTWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.