STX vs. CLS.TO
STX (Seagate Technology plc) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — STX in Computer Hardware, CLS.TO in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, STX returned 51.08%/yr vs 43.71%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STX vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STX is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STX achieves a 238.67% return, which is significantly higher than CLS.TO's 32.76% return. Over the past 10 years, STX has outperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 51.08%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 43.71% annualized return.
STX
- 1D
- 7.25%
- 1M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- 238.67%
- 6M
- 225.10%
- 1Y
- 648.03%
- 3Y*
- 149.80%
- 5Y*
- 62.01%
- 10Y*
- 51.08%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 32.76%
- 6M
- 28.56%
- 1Y
- 202.30%
- 3Y*
- 207.61%
- 5Y*
- 116.14%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
STX vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STX Seagate Technology plc | 238.67% | 225.26% | 4.06% | 69.12% | -51.42% | 87.50% | 10.14% | 62.14% | -2.90% | 16.67% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 32.69% | 220.69% | 215.14% | 160.52% | 1.78% | 37.36% | -2.32% | -6.08% | -16.29% | -11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between STX and CLS.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.35 |
The correlation between STX and CLS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STX:
$212.28B
CLS.TO:
CA$63.66B
STX:
$10.58
CLS.TO:
$8.28
STX:
87.99
CLS.TO:
47.51
STX:
1.05
CLS.TO:
0.64
STX:
19.01
CLS.TO:
3.30
STX:
193.86
CLS.TO:
21.70
STX:
$11.01B
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
STX:
$4.57B
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
STX:
$2.59B
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STX vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
STX
CLS.TO
STX vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seagate Technology plc (STX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STX | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.38 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 31.15 | 6.89 | +24.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 90.13 | 17.06 | +73.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STX vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STX drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, which is greater than CLS.TO's maximum drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STX and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STX | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.74% | -80.63% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.00% | -29.56% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.00% | -53.42% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.99% | -53.42% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.99% | -80.63% | +23.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -16.56% | +15.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.44% | -26.16% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.24% | 11.91% | -4.67% |
Volatility
STX vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Seagate Technology plc (STX) is 19.61%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 28.03%. This indicates that STX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STX | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 28.03% | -8.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.59% | 55.40% | -4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.18% | 72.00% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.86% | 56.84% | -11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.27% | 49.39% | -7.12% |
Dividends
STX vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
STX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STX Seagate Technology plc | 0.31% | 1.05% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 5.32% | 2.40% | 4.21% | 4.27% | 6.53% | 6.02% | 6.60% | 6.14% |
Financials
STX vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seagate Technology plc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STX vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
STX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 3.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
STX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported an operating income of 982.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
STX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a net income of 748.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STX and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STX and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer