STRL vs. NRGU
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) is a stock, while NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Over the past year, STRL returned 163.68% vs 119.26% for NRGU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
STRL vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 109.43% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.
STRL
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- -25.23%
- 6M
- 90.70%
- YTD
- 109.43%
- 1Y
- 163.68%
- 3Y*
- 121.22%
- 5Y*
- 97.80%
- 10Y*
- 60.37%
NRGU
- 1D
- 3.84%
- 1M
- 18.77%
- 6M
- 86.19%
- YTD
- 118.00%
- 1Y
- 119.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRL vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 109.43% | 141.66% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 118.00% | -30.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and NRGU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
NRGU
STRL vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 2.73 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 6.13 | +6.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -57.50% | -35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.46% | -43.89% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.46% | -24.81% | -10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.22% | -26.06% | -20.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.33% | 19.53% | -6.20% |
Volatility
STRL vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) is 22.23%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.23% | 23.48% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.77% | 63.97% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.86% | 76.98% | +7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.71% | 89.07% | -31.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.97% | 89.07% | -35.10% |
Dividends
STRL vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and NRGU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGU has higher volatility (23.48%) compared to STRL (22.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs NRGU's -57.50%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer