STRL vs. LMT
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — STRL in Engineering & Construction, LMT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 60.70%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for LMT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 112.33% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 6.60% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 60.70%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -24.56%
- 6M
- 85.27%
- YTD
- 112.33%
- 1Y
- 159.10%
- 3Y*
- 123.86%
- 5Y*
- 97.68%
- 10Y*
- 60.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.34%
LMT
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.08%
STRL vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 112.33% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 6.60% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and LMT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.14 |
The correlation between STRL and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$19.95B
LMT:
$117.48B
STRL:
$11.16
LMT:
$20.67
STRL:
58.25
LMT:
24.66
STRL:
7.00
LMT:
1.57
STRL:
16.97
LMT:
15.72
STRL:
$2.88B
LMT:
$75.12B
STRL:
$664.66M
LMT:
$7.37B
STRL:
$429.99M
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
LMT
STRL vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 0.48 | +4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 1.03 | +10.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -79.29% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.74% | -26.87% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -31.79% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -31.79% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -36.67% | -22.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.57% | -24.21% | -10.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -26.82% | -19.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.69% | 12.52% | +1.17% |
Volatility
STRL vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 22.45% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 9.48%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.45% | 9.48% | +12.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.61% | 19.58% | +47.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.99% | 27.25% | +57.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.70% | 23.30% | +34.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.99% | 23.94% | +30.05% |
Dividends
STRL vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.68% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STRL vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and LMT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (22.45%) compared to LMT (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs LMT's -79.29%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer