STRL vs. CIFR
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CIFR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, STRL returned 111.61%/yr vs 84.92%/yr for CIFR. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
STRL vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 94.88% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's 51.22% return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -23.15%
- 6M
- 66.74%
- YTD
- 94.88%
- 1Y
- 123.02%
- 3Y*
- 111.61%
- 5Y*
- 93.57%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
CIFR
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 39.85%
- YTD
- 51.22%
- 1Y
- 308.79%
- 3Y*
- 84.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $699.13M | $580.45M | $601.55M | |
| $512.00M | $493.44M | $636.07M |
STRL vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 94.88% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 13.46% |
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. | 51.22% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 637.50% | -87.90% | -54.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and CIFR is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.31 |
The correlation between STRL and CIFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$18.31B
CIFR:
$9.13B
STRL:
$11.16
CIFR:
-$2.32
STRL:
6.42
CIFR:
49.45
STRL:
15.57
CIFR:
12.66
STRL:
$2.88B
CIFR:
$174.98M
STRL:
$664.66M
CIFR:
-$172.84M
STRL:
$429.99M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
CIFR
STRL vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 6.06 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 11.90 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -97.16% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.26% | -51.38% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.26% | -71.74% | +21.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.95% | -23.51% | -16.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -65.01% | +18.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 26.14% | -10.70% |
Volatility
STRL vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) is 31.97%, while Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 46.50%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.97% | 46.50% | -14.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.75% | 79.79% | -8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.81% | 115.46% | -26.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.94% | 122.42% | -63.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 122.42% | -67.76% |
Dividends
STRL vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
STRL vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and CIFR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (46.50%) compared to STRL (31.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer