STRL vs. ALAB
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while ALAB operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, STRL returned 123.02% vs 127.62% for ALAB. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
STRL vs. ALAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 94.88% return, which is significantly higher than ALAB's 87.08% return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -23.15%
- 6M
- 66.74%
- YTD
- 94.88%
- 1Y
- 123.02%
- 3Y*
- 111.61%
- 5Y*
- 93.57%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
ALAB
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- -27.77%
- 6M
- 106.63%
- YTD
- 87.08%
- 1Y
- 127.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 112.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26B | $1.54B | $1.91B | |
| $512.00M | $493.44M | $636.07M |
STRL vs. ALAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 94.88% | 81.79% | 55.40% |
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. | 87.08% | 25.60% | 152.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and ALAB is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | 0.47 |
The correlation between STRL and ALAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$18.31B
ALAB:
$53.35B
STRL:
$11.16
ALAB:
$1.48
STRL:
53.46
ALAB:
210.48
STRL:
6.42
ALAB:
56.25
STRL:
15.57
ALAB:
37.74
STRL:
$2.88B
ALAB:
$1.00B
STRL:
$664.66M
ALAB:
$760.99M
STRL:
$429.99M
ALAB:
$253.12M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. ALAB — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
ALAB
STRL vs. ALAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | ALAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.13 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 4.03 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. ALAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than ALAB's maximum drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and ALAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | ALAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -63.69% | -28.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.26% | -60.19% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.95% | -35.57% | -4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -29.00% | -17.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 31.79% | -16.35% |
Volatility
STRL vs. ALAB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) is 31.97%, while Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a volatility of 34.17%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | ALAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.97% | 34.17% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.75% | 77.73% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.81% | 100.79% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.94% | 95.32% | -36.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 95.32% | -40.66% |
Dividends
STRL vs. ALAB - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor ALAB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
STRL vs. ALAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Astera Labs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. ALAB - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
ALAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
ALAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
ALAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and ALAB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALAB has higher volatility (34.17%) compared to STRL (31.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs ALAB's -63.69%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and ALAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer