ALAB vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

ALAB vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALAB vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.	-34.12%	25.60%	113.53%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	46.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALAB : $19.86B VRT : $98.15B
EPS ALAB : $1.22 VRT : $3.41
PE Ratio ALAB : 90.01 VRT : 73.44
PS Ratio ALAB : 23.14 VRT : 13.32
PB Ratio ALAB : 14.56 VRT : 24.90
Total Revenue (TTM) ALAB : $852.53M VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) ALAB : $645.26M VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) ALAB : $200.85M VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a -34.12% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

ALAB

• 1D: 9.30%
• 1M: -7.77%
• YTD: -34.12%
• 6M: -44.02%
• 1Y: 83.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALAB vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB

ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 71
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 67

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALAB	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	3.97	-3.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	3.91	-2.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.52	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	9.60	-8.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.82	27.88	-25.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALAB vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALAB	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	3.97	-3.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.97	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and VRT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALAB vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

ALAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALAB	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.69%	-71.24%	+7.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.19%	-24.78%	-35.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.49%	-9.26%	-47.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.60%	-16.47%	-14.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.48%	8.53%	+19.95%

Volatility

ALAB vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 25.38% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 20.14%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALAB	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.38%	20.14%	+5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.77%	45.36%	+22.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.68%	62.91%	+28.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.65%	61.08%	+30.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.65%	54.59%	+37.06%

Financials