ALAB vs. CRDO
ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past year, ALAB returned 309.17% vs 241.28% for CRDO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ALAB vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 120.70% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 74.31% return.
ALAB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 57.79%
- YTD
- 120.70%
- 6M
- 146.66%
- 1Y
- 309.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDO
- 1D
- -5.27%
- 1M
- 45.68%
- YTD
- 74.31%
- 6M
- 74.28%
- 1Y
- 241.28%
- 3Y*
- 142.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALAB vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. | 120.70% | 25.60% | 152.00% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 74.31% | 114.09% | 238.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAB and CRDO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ALAB and CRDO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ALAB:
$66.51B
CRDO:
$48.33B
ALAB:
$1.48
CRDO:
$2.50
ALAB:
247.31
CRDO:
100.50
ALAB:
66.09
CRDO:
35.55
ALAB:
44.52
CRDO:
23.42
ALAB:
$1.00B
CRDO:
$1.34B
ALAB:
$760.99M
CRDO:
$908.35M
ALAB:
$253.12M
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAB vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
ALAB
CRDO
ALAB vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALAB | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 4.46 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 10.76 | -1.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALAB vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, roughly equal to the maximum CRDO drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAB | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -62.04% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.19% | -53.59% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -5.27% | +5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -19.38% | -10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.50% | 22.17% | +8.33% |
Volatility
ALAB vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 32.05% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) at 28.41%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAB | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.05% | 28.41% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.52% | 65.16% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.04% | 85.70% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.49% | 81.50% | +11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.49% | 81.50% | +11.99% |
Dividends
ALAB vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAB nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ALAB vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALAB vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
ALAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
ALAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
ALAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAB and CRDO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALAB has higher volatility (32.05%) compared to CRDO (28.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALAB and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer