STPZ vs. EMNT
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT).
STPZ and EMNT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). It was launched on Aug 20, 2009. EMNT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 10, 2019.
Performance
STPZ vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STPZ vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.83% | 6.40% | 4.30% | 4.28% | -4.49% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 0.46% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 0.97% | 4.74% | 5.79% | 5.84% | -0.57% | 0.11% | 2.08% | 0.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMNT's 0.97% return.
STPZ
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
EMNT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STPZ vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
STPZ vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank
STPZ
EMNT
STPZ vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 11.02 | -9.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 23.01 | -20.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 5.88 | -4.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 34.06 | -31.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 226.92 | -218.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 11.02 | -9.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 4.08 | -3.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 3.45 | -2.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and EMNT is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
STPZ vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than EMNT's 4.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 3.59% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 4.23% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and EMNT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -2.28% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -0.13% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.70% | -1.70% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -0.24% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 0.02% | +0.43% |
Volatility
STPZ vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) at 0.24%. This indicates that STPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 0.24% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.21% | 0.29% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38% | 0.41% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 0.82% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 0.87% | +2.11% |