PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOT vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, STOT has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 2.43%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


STOT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.43%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOT vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
0.97%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%4.40%0.95%1.71%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between STOT and SPYM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.04

The correlation between STOT and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STOT vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STOT
SPYM

Communication Services

100.0%
10.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Communication Services

STOT
100.0%
SPYM
10.6%

Basic Materials

STOT

-

SPYM
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

STOT

-

SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

STOT

-

SPYM
4.6%

Energy

STOT

-

SPYM
3.2%

Financial Services

STOT

-

SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

STOT

-

SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

STOT

-

SPYM
7.6%

Real Estate

STOT

-

SPYM
1.8%

Technology

STOT

-

SPYM
38.5%

Utilities

STOT

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STOTSPYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.81

2.39

+1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.93

3.27

+2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.44

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

3.17

+2.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.02

14.76

+9.27

STOT vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STOTSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81

2.39

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.63

0.83

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.87

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.62

+0.50

Drawdowns

STOT vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-54.46%

+48.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-8.90%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-18.72%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

-24.48%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.07%

-33.87%

+27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.66%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-7.15%

+6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

1.91%

-1.73%

Volatility

STOT vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.33%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOTSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

2.83%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

8.90%

-8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

11.80%

-10.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

16.80%

-15.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

18.00%

-15.80%

STOT vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOT vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.41%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOT and SPYM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to STOT (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 2.43% for STOT. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, STOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPYM is S&P 500. STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.02% for SPYM.

STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOT and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer