PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. PULS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

STOT vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STOT vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
0.37%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%4.40%1.51%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
0.89%4.97%6.12%6.26%1.52%0.48%1.47%2.97%1.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 0.89% return.


STOT

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*

PULS

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.89%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


STOT vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

PULS
PULS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STOTPULSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

9.19

-6.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

18.25

-14.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

5.27

-3.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.72

13.80

-8.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.46

95.35

-75.90

STOT vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 9.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and PULS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STOTPULSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

9.19

-6.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.61

5.72

-4.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

2.46

-1.36

Correlation

The correlation between STOT and PULS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

STOT vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than PULS's 5.09% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.46%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
5.09%4.78%5.62%5.48%2.30%1.19%1.85%2.69%1.87%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

STOT vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, roughly equal to the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and PULS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTPULSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-5.85%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-0.34%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

-0.79%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-0.09%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.05%

+0.17%

Volatility

STOT vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.15%. This indicates that STOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STOTPULSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.15%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.80%

0.28%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70%

0.51%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

0.70%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

1.34%

+0.87%