STOT vs. SCHJ
STOT (State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STOT is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while SCHJ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STOT returned 2.81%/yr vs 2.31%/yr for SCHJ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STOT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
STOT vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than SCHJ's 0.56% return.
STOT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
STOT vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 0.97% | 5.56% | 5.26% | 6.39% | -3.75% | 0.27% | 2.43% | 0.39% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between STOT and SCHJ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between STOT and SCHJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
STOT vs. SCHJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STOT
SCHJ
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
STOT
SCHJ
Basic Materials
STOT
-
SCHJ
Consumer Cyclical
STOT
-
SCHJ
Consumer Defensive
STOT
-
SCHJ
Energy
STOT
-
SCHJ
Financial Services
STOT
-
SCHJ
Healthcare
STOT
-
SCHJ
Industrials
STOT
-
SCHJ
Real Estate
STOT
-
SCHJ
Technology
STOT
-
SCHJ
Utilities
STOT
-
SCHJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STOT vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
STOT
SCHJ
STOT vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STOT | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.81 | 2.42 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.93 | 3.78 | +2.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.48 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 3.08 | +2.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.02 | 12.17 | +11.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STOT | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81 | 2.42 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.63 | 0.79 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.64 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
STOT vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STOT | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -13.62% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | -1.47% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.76% | -1.47% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.07% | -9.43% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.45% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -1.88% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 0.37% | -0.19% |
Volatility
STOT vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.33%, while Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a volatility of 0.55%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STOT | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 0.55% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.84% | 1.35% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11% | 1.87% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 2.94% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 4.13% | -1.93% |
STOT vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
STOT vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than SCHJ's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 4.41% | 4.52% | 5.10% | 4.53% | 2.54% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STOT and SCHJ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHJ has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to STOT (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.
On 5-year performance, STOT leads with 2.81% vs 2.31% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, STOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, STOT has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.41% for STOT.
STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SCHJ is Corporate Bonds. STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.05% for SCHJ.
STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STOT and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer