PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. SCHJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOT vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than SCHJ's 0.56% return.


STOT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.43%

SCHJ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOT vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
0.97%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%0.39%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between STOT and SCHJ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.54

The correlation between STOT and SCHJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STOT vs. SCHJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STOT
SCHJ

Communication Services

100.0%
4.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

4.0%

Financial Services

-

30.8%

Healthcare

-

7.9%

Industrials

-

7.2%

Real Estate

-

4.1%

Technology

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Communication Services

STOT
100.0%
SCHJ
4.3%

Basic Materials

STOT

-

SCHJ
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

STOT

-

SCHJ
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

STOT

-

SCHJ
4.6%

Energy

STOT

-

SCHJ
4.0%

Financial Services

STOT

-

SCHJ
30.8%

Healthcare

STOT

-

SCHJ
7.9%

Industrials

STOT

-

SCHJ
7.2%

Real Estate

STOT

-

SCHJ
4.1%

Technology

STOT

-

SCHJ
8.3%

Utilities

STOT

-

SCHJ
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STOTSCHJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.81

2.42

+1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.93

3.78

+2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.48

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

3.08

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.02

12.17

+11.85

STOT vs. SCHJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the SCHJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and SCHJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STOTSCHJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81

2.42

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.63

0.79

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.64

+0.48

Drawdowns

STOT vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and SCHJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTSCHJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-13.62%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-1.47%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-1.47%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

-9.43%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.45%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-1.88%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.37%

-0.19%

Volatility

STOT vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.33%, while Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a volatility of 0.55%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOTSCHJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.55%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

1.35%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

1.87%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

2.94%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

4.13%

-1.93%

STOT vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOT vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than SCHJ's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.41%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOT and SCHJ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHJ has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to STOT (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.

On 5-year performance, STOT leads with 2.81% vs 2.31% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, STOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, STOT has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.41% for STOT.

STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SCHJ is Corporate Bonds. STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.05% for SCHJ.

STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOT and SCHJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer