PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. BBSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOT vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than BBSB's 0.46% return.


STOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.29%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.43%

BBSB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.63%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOT vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between STOT and BBSB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2023

0.63

The correlation between STOT and BBSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSB
BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STOTBBSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.48

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

3.48

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.23

13.90

+8.33

STOT vs. BBSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the BBSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and BBSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STOT vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, which is greater than BBSB's maximum drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and BBSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTBBSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-1.57%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-0.86%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-0.96%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.26%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-0.31%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.21%

-0.03%

Volatility

STOT vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.37%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOTBBSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.41%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

0.90%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13%

1.28%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

1.66%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

1.66%

+0.54%

STOT vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOT vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than BBSB's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBSB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF
3.81%3.69%4.84%3.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.40%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOT and BBSB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSB has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to STOT (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs BBSB's -1.57%.

On 3-year performance, STOT leads with 5.23% vs 4.20% for BBSB. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STOT has performed better with a 5.23% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.81% for BBSB.

STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBSB is Government Bonds. STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while BBSB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.04% for BBSB.

STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOT and BBSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer