STNC vs. SPIT
STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
STNC vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 25.30% return.
STNC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 23.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STNC vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 9.57% | 2.60% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 25.30% | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNC and SPIT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNC vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
STNC
SPIT
STNC vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 2.00 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
STNC vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -12.49% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.85% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -2.62% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
STNC vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 26.35% | -12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 26.35% | -10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 26.35% | -10.96% |
STNC vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
STNC vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SPIT's 5.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.73% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.96% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STNC and SPIT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STNC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STNC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 0.93% for STNC.
They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for STNC and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer