STNC vs. SGRT
STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
STNC vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
STNC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STNC vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 9.57% | 2.37% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNC and SGRT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNC vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
STNC
SGRT
STNC vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 3.81 | -3.28 |
Drawdowns
STNC vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -17.87% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | 0.00% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -3.11% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
STNC vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 33.41% | -19.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 33.41% | -17.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 33.41% | -18.02% |
STNC vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
STNC vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.96% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STNC and SGRT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.
STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for STNC and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer