PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STNC vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STNC vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return.


STNC

1D
0.53%
1M
3.49%
YTD
9.57%
6M
11.33%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNC vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
9.57%10.33%8.92%11.49%-13.10%17.77%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%17.72%

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and SCHB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2021

0.84

The correlation between STNC and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STNC vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STNC
SCHB

Consumer Cyclical

19.9%
10.1%

Technology

19.9%
34.4%

Healthcare

13.8%
8.9%

Industrials

12.0%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.6%

Communication Services

7.9%
10.1%

Financial Services

6.3%
12.2%

Utilities

4.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.4%

Energy

-

3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

STNC
19.9%
SCHB
10.1%

Technology

STNC
19.9%
SCHB
34.4%

Healthcare

STNC
13.8%
SCHB
8.9%

Industrials

STNC
12.0%
SCHB
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

STNC
8.5%
SCHB
4.6%

Communication Services

STNC
7.9%
SCHB
10.1%

Financial Services

STNC
6.3%
SCHB
12.2%

Utilities

STNC
4.8%
SCHB
2.3%

Basic Materials

STNC
4.1%
SCHB
2.0%

Real Estate

STNC
2.9%
SCHB
2.4%

Energy

STNC

-

SCHB
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STNC vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC
STNC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNC vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STNCSCHBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.33

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

3.19

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.17

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.78

14.55

-5.77

STNC vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STNCSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.33

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.83

-0.30

Drawdowns

STNC vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNCSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-35.27%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-8.91%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-19.34%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-25.41%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.72%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-4.12%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.94%

+0.40%

Volatility

STNC vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNCSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.01%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

9.14%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

12.12%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

17.24%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

18.32%

-2.93%

STNC vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

STNC vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
0.93%1.02%0.96%0.08%0.58%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STNC and SCHB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STNC has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 12.76% vs 7.71% for STNC. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.93% for STNC.

STNC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STNC and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer