PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STNC vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STNC vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Stance ESG ETF (STNC) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.18% return.


STNC

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.41%
6M
6.93%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.09%

IOO

1D
1.15%
1M
3.02%
6M
10.29%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
30.07%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
15.80%
10Y*
16.41%
ALL TIME*
7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.71M$29.92M$34.31M
$80.91K$76.39K$55.00K

STNC vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STNC
Hennessy Stance ESG ETF
11.50%10.33%8.92%11.49%-13.10%17.04%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
12.18%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and IOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021

0.73

The correlation between STNC and IOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STNC vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STNC
IOO

Technology

27.3%
45.4%

Consumer Cyclical

17.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

12.7%
9.2%

Industrials

11.6%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
5.8%

Financial Services

6.3%
10.0%

Communication Services

6.2%
10.7%

Utilities

4.6%
0.5%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.7%

Real Estate

3.0%
0.2%

Energy

-

3.5%

Technology

STNC
27.3%
IOO
45.4%

Consumer Cyclical

STNC
17.9%
IOO
7.8%

Healthcare

STNC
12.7%
IOO
9.2%

Industrials

STNC
11.6%
IOO
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

STNC
6.9%
IOO
5.8%

Financial Services

STNC
6.3%
IOO
10.0%

Communication Services

STNC
6.2%
IOO
10.7%

Utilities

STNC
4.6%
IOO
0.5%

Basic Materials

STNC
3.5%
IOO
1.7%

Real Estate

STNC
3.0%
IOO
0.2%

Energy

STNC

-

IOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STNC vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STNC
STNC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STNC vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Stance ESG ETF (STNC) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STNCIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.81

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

10.47

-3.22

STNC vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STNC vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and IOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNCIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-55.85%

+33.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-9.94%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-19.19%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-23.52%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

-1.39%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-11.22%

+5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.66%

0.00%

Volatility

STNC vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Stance ESG ETF (STNC) is 3.41%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that STNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNCIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.30%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

11.83%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

14.73%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

17.21%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

17.73%

-2.27%

STNC vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

STNC vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than IOO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.83%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%
STNC
Hennessy Stance ESG ETF
0.91%1.02%0.96%0.08%0.58%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STNC and IOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOO has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to STNC (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs IOO's -55.85%.

On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 15.80% vs 7.12% for STNC. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, STNC has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.

STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.83% for IOO.

STNC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hennessy and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.40% for IOO.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STNC and IOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer