STNC vs. IOO
STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STNC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Red Gate Advisers LLC, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). STNC is actively managed, while IOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STNC returned 7.71%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for IOO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
STNC vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.26% return.
STNC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
STNC vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 9.57% | 10.33% | 8.92% | 11.49% | -13.10% | 17.77% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.26% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 19.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNC and IOO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between STNC and IOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
STNC vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STNC
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
STNC
IOO
Technology
STNC
IOO
Healthcare
STNC
IOO
Industrials
STNC
IOO
Consumer Defensive
STNC
IOO
Communication Services
STNC
IOO
Financial Services
STNC
IOO
Utilities
STNC
IOO
Basic Materials
STNC
IOO
Real Estate
STNC
IOO
Energy
STNC
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNC vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
STNC
IOO
STNC vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNC | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.50 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.87 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 17.94 | -9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNC | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.84 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.98 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
STNC vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNC | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -55.85% | +33.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -9.94% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | -19.19% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -23.52% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.33% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -11.27% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.14% | +0.20% |
Volatility
STNC vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNC | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 3.81% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 10.59% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 13.54% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 17.04% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 17.78% | -2.39% |
STNC vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
STNC vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than IOO's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.96% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STNC and IOO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STNC has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.68% vs 7.71% for STNC. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.
STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.
STNC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STNC and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer