STNC vs. GQGU
STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
STNC vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.60% return.
STNC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STNC vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 9.57% | 6.63% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNC and GQGU is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNC vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
STNC
GQGU
STNC vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
STNC vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -6.65% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -4.66% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -2.54% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
STNC vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 10.14% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 10.14% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 10.14% | +5.25% |
STNC vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
STNC vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.96% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STNC and GQGU have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.93% for STNC.
They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for STNC and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer